<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: we&#8217;re gonna need a bigger X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/</link>
	<description>Snowclones are the new eggcorns.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowclones</title>
		<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snowclones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the more reason for him to have said &quot;we,&quot; eh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the more reason for him to have said &#8220;we,&#8221; eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I should have specified the context: he&#039;s &lt;i&gt;in&lt;/i&gt; the boat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I should have specified the context: he&#8217;s <i>in</i> the boat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snowclones</title>
		<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[snowclones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got the quote from IMdB, so yes, I was missing some context. 

&lt;i&gt;And I think it’s corrupted to ‘We’re…’ because a) it would actually make more sense if he said that...&lt;/i&gt;

I think this is arguable. It makes more sense to *me*, having never seen the movie, that he&#039;d say &quot;we&quot;, but there&#039;s nothing about the expression independent of its original context (i.e. how the snowclone is heard) that makes it more natural. Cooperation is implied in fighting a huge fucking shark, which makes the &quot;we&quot; more natural in some sense, but if Brody is speaking from the position of &quot;you people are all on your own on this one, suckers&quot; then &quot;you&quot; would make more sense.

As for the quickness of the original dialogue causing &quot;mishearing&quot;, sure. It would also contribute to misremembering the line, the same way people misremember &quot;beam me up, Scotty&quot; or &quot;it&#039;s elementary, my dear Watson&quot;. (Those lines were never spoken in their respective TV shows/movies.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the quote from IMdB, so yes, I was missing some context. </p>
<p><i>And I think it’s corrupted to ‘We’re…’ because a) it would actually make more sense if he said that&#8230;</i></p>
<p>I think this is arguable. It makes more sense to *me*, having never seen the movie, that he&#8217;d say &#8220;we&#8221;, but there&#8217;s nothing about the expression independent of its original context (i.e. how the snowclone is heard) that makes it more natural. Cooperation is implied in fighting a huge fucking shark, which makes the &#8220;we&#8221; more natural in some sense, but if Brody is speaking from the position of &#8220;you people are all on your own on this one, suckers&#8221; then &#8220;you&#8221; would make more sense.</p>
<p>As for the quickness of the original dialogue causing &#8220;mishearing&#8221;, sure. It would also contribute to misremembering the line, the same way people misremember &#8220;beam me up, Scotty&#8221; or &#8220;it&#8217;s elementary, my dear Watson&#8221;. (Those lines were never spoken in their respective TV shows/movies.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;The group ... are told&#039;? I can only conclude that you&#039;re the last remaining sentient life form on Earth who hasn&#039;t seen Jaws, since every other SLF knows that Chief Brody (one of the &#039;group&#039;) says it after he sees the villain for the first time.

And I think it&#039;s corrupted to &#039;We&#039;re...&#039; because a) it would actually make more sense if he said that, and b) he says it pretty quickly, so, given (a), it&#039;s easy to mishear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The group &#8230; are told&#8217;? I can only conclude that you&#8217;re the last remaining sentient life form on Earth who hasn&#8217;t seen Jaws, since every other SLF knows that Chief Brody (one of the &#8216;group&#8217;) says it after he sees the villain for the first time.</p>
<p>And I think it&#8217;s corrupted to &#8216;We&#8217;re&#8230;&#8217; because a) it would actually make more sense if he said that, and b) he says it pretty quickly, so, given (a), it&#8217;s easy to mishear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the movie &quot;Clerks,&quot; from 1994, one of the characters uses the original form (&quot;boat&quot;) but says &quot;we&#039;re,&quot; not &quot;you&#039;re.&quot;  The Internet was indeed around in 1994, but was not commonly available, so I think the change from &quot;you&#039;re&quot; to &quot;we&#039;re&quot; occurred outside the bounds of Internet dialogue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the movie &#8220;Clerks,&#8221; from 1994, one of the characters uses the original form (&#8220;boat&#8221;) but says &#8220;we&#8217;re,&#8221; not &#8220;you&#8217;re.&#8221;  The Internet was indeed around in 1994, but was not commonly available, so I think the change from &#8220;you&#8217;re&#8221; to &#8220;we&#8217;re&#8221; occurred outside the bounds of Internet dialogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may also be linked with an ancient joke about two fellas selling watermelons. They drove down to Georgia, bought 100 watermelons for $2 each, and painted a big sign Watermelons $2.50, or 3 for $5.00. After selling out, they counted their money and one said, &quot;Know sumpthin&#039; Clem? We&#039;re gonna have to git a bigger truck!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may also be linked with an ancient joke about two fellas selling watermelons. They drove down to Georgia, bought 100 watermelons for $2 each, and painted a big sign Watermelons $2.50, or 3 for $5.00. After selling out, they counted their money and one said, &#8220;Know sumpthin&#8217; Clem? We&#8217;re gonna have to git a bigger truck!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snowclones.org/2008/02/06/were-gonna-need-a-bigger-x/#comment-2039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that the most well-known use of this snow clone would have been in the Taco Bell commercial cross-promoting the Godzilla movie. On seeing the size of Godzilla, the Taco Bell chihuahua announces that he&#039;s &quot;gonna need a bigger box&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the most well-known use of this snow clone would have been in the Taco Bell commercial cross-promoting the Godzilla movie. On seeing the size of Godzilla, the Taco Bell chihuahua announces that he&#8217;s &#8220;gonna need a bigger box&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

